Call for a Paradigm Shift in Fundamental Physics

[BradGuth]

On Jun 1, 11:40 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"

Friends,

"Paradigm Shift" is marketing lingo and amounts to "Nonsense".
You picked the wrong newsgroup for this.
Dirk Vdm

He's also not Jewish, or perhaps merely not Jewish enough, by which is
your primary cause for taking those actions in the past, present and
future. As such, you wouldn't revise anything no matters what the
consequences. So what's the difference, or what's your point?

Are you suggesting that your sci.astro doesn't accommodate and
systematically promote mainstream "Nonsense"?

~ BG

[GSS]

On Jun 1, 11:40 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel"

Friends,

"Paradigm Shift" is marketing lingo and amounts to "Nonsense".
You picked the wrong newsgroup for this.
Dirk Vdm

Kindly refer to "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas S.
Kuhn. A Synopsis from the original by Professor Frank Pajares is
available at,
http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/kuhnsyn.html

I said,
A set of beliefs, dogmas, postulates and axioms, along with concepts
and notions derived from particular interpretation of different
physical observations, constitute the paradigm of fundamental physics.
Under the current paradigm, it is generally believed that a
fundamental theory of Physics need not be based on logical foundation
and need not contain causal linkages for physical explanation.
However, it is a fact that the current paradigm does not provide
logical foundations to the mathematical models which are being
projected as physical theories. In the grand maze of the unknown, the
current paradigm has lead Fundamental Physics to a dead end. To come
out of this state, we need to change the direction of research and
hence, change the current paradigm of Fundamental Physics.

GSS